A Convicted Murderer, a Columbia Grad, and a Missionary

IT IS LIKE A MIRACLE… for a man, who never knew a letter, to walk out of our school in an hour able to read a whole page of his own language with Roman letters.

We see that miracle happen over and over, every day. But the joy of seeing people learning ten times as fast as they expected to learn, and all set up about their own brilliance does not lose its edge. Frank Laubach

This is the story about the most unlikely teachers, the most suspicious students, and the most miraculous results. It began in 1930 in the Lanao Province of Mindanao, in the southern Philippines. An ambitious young missionary and his wife had decided on the location for their mission field, but before they left for the Philippines, that aspiring missionary-to-be, Frank Laubach, presented a short speech to a farewell party. He explained why they had chosen Mindanao.

“If I were in a battle, and with no orders from my captain, I would be a coward if I fought where we were winning; I would be a man if I fought where our ranks were thin, and we were losing the battle. We are in a battle for Jesus Christ, to conquer the world, and the ranks are thinnest and the battle hottest in the Orient. So, we are going where we are needed most.”

Upon arrival they were told by Army officers that inexperienced missionaries talking religion would only make matters worse. They didn’t think they would be accepted by the Lanaon people (the Moros). After living several months outside of Mindanao, however, Laubach had established some report with the Moros, and he decided to pursue a more thorough knowledge of the language. He asked an American officer to recommend a teacher.

The recommendation? Pambaya, a convicted murderer who had successfully appealed his case, and thereby escaped a twenty-year prison sentence. (Laubach explains in his memoire that this man eventually, “helped us prepare our dictionary and translate thousands of pages into Maranaw, including the Gospel of Luke and the Book of Acts.”)

Laubach and Pambaya were joined by a Filipino, Donato Galia, who was a master’s level graduate of Columbia Teachers College, and Pambaya began to teach them. They quickly learned that the Maranaw language had never been written, only spoken. So, the three worked together to create a written form of the Maranaw language, and there began the journey.

The men chose to create an alphabet to represent the sounds of the language (12 consonants and 4 vowels – b, d, g, k, l, m, n, p, r, s, t, ng, a, i, o, u.) They would use the new writing system to publish Maranaw poetry, historical accounts, and other cultural elements of interest. Then, they would teach the people to read.

They devised a system for teaching the alphabet, beginning with three words which contained all the consonants in the language. They were Malabanga, (a town in Lanoa); karatasa (paper); and paganada (to study or learn). Then they broke the words into syllables like this:

Malabanga: /ma/-/la/-/ba/-/nga/

Karatasa: /ka/-/ra/-/ta/-/sa/

Paganada: /pa/-/ga/-/na/-/da/

Next, they began teaching words with those syllables, like ma ma (man); a ma (father); ma la (big), and so on. They developed phonics charts for teaching the alphabet and words.

Learners would practice reading from the charts, reciting the sounds (phonemes) that corresponded with the markings (graphemes) on the chart. Laubach’s stories, about his varied experiences while teaching reading, imply that the process was simple, and that many learned very quickly. Here is one such account, in which the fluency was still lacking, but the understanding about how words work was established:

“Two Moros just came in to show me how they are learning to read. Very, very slowly but correctly. One read a paragraph. Perhaps in another month he will attain fair speed. He has passed the first and hardest achievement, for he knows that letters can be so pronounced together, that they form themselves into words and convey the ideas he wants to express.”

“It is like a miracle,” Laubach accounted later, “for a man, who never knew a letter, to walk out of our school in an hour able to read a whole page of his own language with Roman letters. We see that miracle happen over and over, every day. But the joy of seeing people learning ten times as fast as they expected to learn, and all set up about their own brilliance does not lose its edge.”

Laubach also noted that his co-laborer, Donato Galia (the Columbia Grad), was reported to have taught nine Moros to read in half an hour.

I felt swept on by a power that I could neither explain nor control. I was a little part of it, and so were all the others. I know it was the spirit of God in a strange new form.” (Frank Laubach)

 Laughter & Literacy – The Legacy of Love

Frank Laubach’s work did not stop in the Philippines. He spent 30 years taking literacy around the world with campaigns to areas including Japan, India, Africa, Latin America, Turkey, Thailand, and China. He was blind to race and to religion. He was led by the single desire to bring literacy to “the silent billion”.

Laubach believed that the illiterate masses were imprisoned by their inability to read. Without literacy they had no voice. They were easily swindled by the literate. Enslaved. He worked to set the captives free, and he equated this work with the work of giving sight to the blind.

And joy followed him. He reported great episodes of laughter among learners. One old man thought he was too old to learn to read. Yet, within fifteen minutes he had learned the phonetic Alphabet created for the Moros.

“We kept him roaring with laughter,” reported Laubach.

Once, in a class setting, another learner became so hysterical with laughter, that the class was shut down until he was able to regain his composure.

And that contagious laughter still echoes around the world.

 Frank Laubach Remembers a Prisoner’s Poem

 (From “I Remember”, The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 32, No. 9; May 1951)

“During the last twenty years there have been, not dozens nor hundreds, but thousands of evidences of the wistful eagerness of illiterates to read. There rises before my memory the enormous campaign in Bihar Province, India, and Moslems and Hindus forgot their antipathy and taught one another. I saw school buildings and homes crowded with eager learners. At Gaya jail fifteen hundred prisoners were teaching one another, and as I came in, they treated me like a god from heaven. While other prisoners and the warden wept, the poet of the prison recited a long poem containing these lines:”

SPRING (by the “Poet of the Prison”)

The Spring season has set in for our souls.

The name of God has a new sweetness.

The garden of my heart has blossomed forth with new beauty.

Praise be to God for the exceeding grace He has shown to us in prison.

The days of our sighs and groans are over and a new song is on our lips.

 

We were in a prison of the mind long before we came to this jail.

Today there is a new longing in our hearts.

India has been living in a dungeon of ignorance,

but now the good news has reached us

that the day of her emancipation is dawning.

 

No longer shall we be slaves of midnight ignorance.

Who am I, that I dare to dream the incredible new aspirations

which fill my soul!

Mahatma Gandhi and Laubach Discuss Literacy

(As told by Frank Laubach in his book, The Silent Billion Speak, 1943)

I had an interesting conversation with Mahatma Gandhi in 1935 when I first visited India. We had just completed a reading chart in the Marathi language, and I took it to Wardha to show Gandhi what we were attempting. He was sitting on the floor. I sat down cross-legged in front of him and unrolled the Marathi [phonics] chart. He glanced at it, then looked up, and, to my amazement, said:

“I doubt whether India ought to become literate.”

“You are the first person I ever heard say that,” I said, hardly believing my ears. “What do you mean?”

“The literature you publish in the West is not fit for India to read. Look at what you are writing and selling us on any railway stand.” He was right about that – I had looked! Without waiting for my reply, this man, revered as a saint by millions, gave me a second punch before I had recovered from the first – and don’t you agree that this was “the most unkindest cut of all” to a Christian missionary?

“Many of the greatest benefactors of the human race have been illiterate – Mohammed, for example.” My answers, I think, came out of heaven. At least I haven’t been able to think of any others as good in seven years.

“Mr. Gandhi,” I said, “you are right. But on the other hand, millions of us admire you and have read your books with great blessing. If you had not written these books and if we had not learned to read, we should never have heard of you.”

Mr. Gandhi dropped his head and said meekly, “I think I would have done a little good.”

The other answer came to me that instant and I let him have it: “The greatest single blessing that ever came to this world was the life and teaching of Jesus Christ. If Christ’s life had not been written and if we had not been able to read the Gospels, we would know very little about him.”

Mr. Gandhi shook his head up and down slowly and silently for a few moments, and he looked through me every time his head came up. I wish I knew what he meant by that head shake. He changed the subject.

“I really do believe in literacy for India,” he said at last. “Indeed, I have probably been instrumental in teaching thirty thousand indirectly myself. But by far the largest question for India is how to feed her hungry multitudes.”

“This,” I said, “is exactly why India needs to become literate. The right way to lift the masses above hunger is to teach them to lift themselves. Your illiterates have been the victim of educated scoundrels who have kept them in debt all their lives. Literacy is the only road I see to their complete emancipation.”

The truth is that Mr. Gandhi, like nearly all Indian leaders in those years, was in despair about teaching people so underfed and so overworked as the masse of India are, and believed that economic relief had to come before they could take even the first step toward education. But in subsequent years, first in one corner of India, then in another, ever larger literacy movements began to appear, indicating that perhaps, after all, literacy is the horse that should come before the cart. In more recent years Mr. Gandhi has become more and more emphatic in saying that illiteracy can be and must be wiped out in India. In 1939 he wrote in the papers: “I am converted, and now believe that literacy should be required for the franchise. If each one of us will teach one illiterate, we can make India literate in no time!”

And now all India is on the march to become literate!

Into the Second Laubach Generation

“My dad was known around the world for something called, “Each on Teach One”. How did that start? One time a village chief in the Philippines said, “I did not pay when I learned how to read, but I can pay if I go and teach somebody else.” [Then the chief picked up a large sword, gesturing across his neck and said], “Each one, teach one, or die.” Dr. Bob Laubach

And thus began the Laubach crusade, which continued through two lifetimes.

Frank Laubach was eventually honored in legend as “The Man who Taught Millions to Read”. He had created simple phonics charts in 262 languages. He loved literacy, and he loved the freedom it brought. He believed that literacy not only gave people a voice, but it opened up something much more powerful. It gave them access to the Word of God, found in the Holy Bible. Laubach believed that teaching people to read was necessary in the mission field, so that spiritual growth would continue, through the reading of scripture, after the missionaries were gone.

His son, Dr. Robert (Bob) Laubach, born in the Philippines, became his assistant at a young age, and continued working with him into adulthood. They became a team, dedicated to international literacy missionary work.

Like his father, he gave his life to the cause. His achievements included the development of a university course, “Writing for New Literates”, with which he founded the Syracuse University Literacy Journalism program. He taught educators around the world to prepare materials for new readers. He developed a publication for new adult readers called News for You, and he founded a publishing company, New Readers Press, which now publishes over 400 educational titles for adult learners. Bob Laubach created a motto of his own, “Keep Smiling”.

What a joy-filled life he has had!

Coming next: Chapter Four —  The Boy who Traded Bread for Lessons

from Dyslexic no More: Saved by the ABC’s

by Meg Rayborn Dawson (homeschooling mom of 9)

MS, Exceptional Student Education (Univ. of W. Florida) emphasis on Applied Behavior Analysis

MA, psychology (Grand Canyon University)

Bachelor of Arts (Northwest Nazarene University)

 

***************************************************************

WEBSITE     TESTIMONIALS    

CATHY DUFFY REVIEW

OTHER REVIEWS     AWARDS     

HOW TO ORDER

For Parents who are concerned about assuring a solid base for their Children’s education. READING is the bedrock.  One good way to assure the best results is to teach your OWN children to read.  And it is much easier than you ever dreamed.  All you need is a good program like ALPHA-PHONICS.  Alpha-Phonics has been  used by tens of thousands of Parents, easily and successfully FOR 38 YEARS.  Most Parents find they only need 15-30 minutes a day and can complete the course in only a few Months.  Parents need NO experience or special training to teach their Children to become excellent readers. This may sound impossible, but, if you read the reviews and testimonials below, you will learn it is true.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in education, homeschooling, Phonics, Reading, schools, teaching, The Silent Billion Speak, tutoring | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

MY FAVORITE TEACHER: Creating a ‘safe place’ for students

MY FAVORITE TEACHER: Creating a ‘safe place’ for students

MY FAVORITE TEACHER is helping fill a need for rural families with special needs kids.

 Jim Mertens

MONMOUTH, Ill. — Each year News 8 receives nominations from students throughout eastern Iowa and western Illinois who want to recognize “My Favorite Teacher.” We feature five outstanding educators each year.

United West Elementary School north of Monmouth looks like any other school in a rural school district, but it has a very special place.

t’s the “Wonder Pod,” and inside is special education teacher Meleiah Sims and fifth grader Conner Hare.

“Every day is a different day, a new challenge,” said Conner’s mother, Megan.

Mrs. Sims is a woman in Conner’s life who has met the challenge.

 “Can you tell Miss Sims you’re my favorite teacher?” asks Megan as Conner presents one of the five “My Favorite Teacher” awards for 2022.

Conner can’t communicate well yet. Diagnosed with autism at 18 months old, he’s come to depend on his mother and family at home – and Mrs. Sims at school.

“It’s easy to send him to school knowing he’s with somebody that will do the best for him, wants the best for him, and loves him almost as much as I do,” said Megan Hare.

Meleiah Sims has been in education for 31 years but came to United West four years ago to create what’s affectionately called the “Wonder Pod.”

What were once school offices is now a four room safe place, complete with sensory conscious colors and materials to allow children with special needs to thrive.

“It’s just been perfect,” Mrs. Sims said.

“Like a dream come true for me. It’s what I always wanted to do was design a classroom that would have all the elements that would make it the best possible for these kids and they let me do that.”

But it’s also perfect for Conner and the families living in rural areas who have few options outside the bigger cities for their children to learn and grow.

“The need is great, especially in these areas,” she added.

The Hares live in Alexis, and say they might otherwise need to drive Conner to the Quad Cities or Peoria for the type of attention and education he gets at United West Elementary.

“She just knows him so well and I just feel so comfortable with him here with her because I know he’s safe,” Megan Hare said.

“We just need to give them a way to communicate their wants and needs,” Mrs. Sims said regarding the handful of students who get the individual attention they need.

This will be Conner’s last year with Mrs. Sims.

The 10-year-old has been in this classroom since first grade, but it will soon be time to move on.

The Hares aren’t sure how Conner will adjust to new people and a new place to learn.

But they are grateful for the four years he’s spent at United West’s Wonder Pod.

“Mrs. Sims and her staff Mrs. (Angela) Reimolds, Mrs. (Kelley) Whitsitt and Mrs. Bellinger (his bus driver) make it easy for this overprotective mom to her send her minimally verbal, autistic son to school each day knowing he is loved and well taken care of,” Megan said.

**********************************************************************************

For Parents who during the Coronavirus Crisis  are Homeschooling, and whose interest is in making sure their children are adequately being taught to READ, we suggest they consider using Alpha-Phonics.  It has been used successfully for over 37 years by  tens of thousands of PARENTS to easily teach their children to become excellent  readers.  It is simple to teach, is always effective and inexpensive.  YOU CAN DO IT !!  Learn all about it below:

 

Posted in MY FAVORITE TEACHER: Creating a 'safe place' for students | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Latina teenagers in United States spend more time with parents and siblings than do other teenagers

Latina teenagers in United States spend more time with parents and siblings than do other teenagers

By Elizabeth Ackert and Jocelyn Wikle | March 2022 

Differences in attitudes and values, ‘familismo’ and ‘marianismo’, may explain why Latina teenagers spend more time with their families than do teens from other ethnic groups.

Why might Latina teenagers spend more time with family? We studied data from the American Time Use Survey (ATUS) between 2003 and 2019, and found that differences in household structure, family structure, youth’s work hours, parents’ education, parents’ work, and geographic region could not fully explain differences in time Latinos’/as’ time spent with family versus with peers.

Extra time with family, especially for Latina youth, could be due to differences in attitudes and values related to familismo and marianismo.

Instead, we believe the extra time with family, especially for Latina youth, could be due to differences in attitudes and values related to familismo and marianismo. Familismo attitudes place a high value on family closeness, cohesion, and reciprocity. Marianismo involves the belief that girls should be nurturing and self-sacrificing for family.

Extra time with family, especially for Latina youth, could also be both an asset and a constraint. Several studies show that when familismo is strong, there is likely to be less family conflict, lower adolescent-parent conflict, more tight-knit families, and fewer suicide attempts. Yet, extra time with family could be a constraint on Latino/a youth if familismo values such as spending time together are not shared between parents and children or if time with family is burdensome or overwhelming. Additionally, extra time with family could be detrimental if it entails saying no to opportunities outside the household, such as educational or extracurricular activities, or even going to college away from home.

Other findings from our research

In our analysis of the ATUS from 2003 to 2019, we examined daily family contact patterns –  the total daily minutes spent with both nuclear and extended family – among Latino/a 15- to 18 year-olds. For the sake of comparison, we also included Black and White youth of the same age. Opportunities for family time may depend on who lives in the household, so we focused on youth who had focal family members (e.g., siblings, grandparents) living in their households.

On average, Latino/a youth spent more time with their parents than did Black youth, and more time with siblings than did both White and Black youth. Latino boys spent less time with parents, but more time with siblings, than did White boys.

It may be time to reconsider what we think of as a “typical U.S. teenager who distances themselves from family.”

Our analysis yielded some unexpected results: We thought Latino/a youth in immigrant households would spend more time with family than Latino/a youth whose parents were born in the United States, yet we found no such differences. Latino boys in immigrant households did spend more time with siblings but also spent less time with household adult relatives than Latino boys in non-immigrant households. We also thought Latino/a youth might spend more time with extended family than their White and Black counterparts did, but we found few racial/ethnic differences in time with extended families among the three groups.

References

  • Ackert E & Wikle JS (2021), Familism among Latino/a adolescents: Evidence from time-use data, Journal of Marriage and Family, 1.21 
  • ********************************************************************************************************************************************************

    Did you know every year many 1,000’s of parents teach their own children to READ? Many of them have used  Alpha-Phonics because they have found it can easily be used to teach their children to read. Your Kids can make a lot of headway in only a couple of weeks with this proven program.  Alpha-Phonics is easy to teach, is always effective and requires no special training for the Parent.   It works !  And it is  very inexpensive.  You CAN DO it !!  Follow the links below to know all about the time-tested (38 + years) Alpha-Phonics program:

     

     

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Carpenters, Musicians & the ABC’s

Consider carpenters.

Before starting projects, they must understand their tools and how to use them.

Consider musicians. Before joining orchestras, they must understand notes and how to follow them.

Consider readers. Before reading, they must understand letters and how to blend them.

Uninformed carpenters will lack craftmanship.

Untrained musicians will not harmonize.

Unprepared readers will not blend letter sounds into words.

Ultimately, the carpenters, musicians and readers will fail. They will not be carpenters, nor musicians, nor readers.

Understanding Letters and How to Blend Them

Definitions

Phonemes: Letter sounds, blended to make spoken words

Phonemic Awareness: The reader’s ability to recognize that words are made up of blended sounds (like the carpenter’s knowledge of tools, and the musician’s understanding of notes)

Graphemes: The written representations of phonemes

Decoding: Sounding out words

When phonemes are written down, they become graphemes. (We hear phonemes. We read graphemes.) Readers’ eyes must move from left to right across a single grapheme or a combination of graphemes (which make up words). Readers’ memories convert the graphemes to the sounds they represent, and readers use their brains to blend those sounds in order, to hear words. These processes must be practiced until they become automatic. That’s how you learn to read.

For example, try this:

When you see “a”, say /a/ (as in cat).

When you see “m”, say /m/ (as in mom).

/a/ – /m/

Now blend the sounds /a/—/m/, and read am.

Next, try this:

When you see “h”, say /h/ (as in hay)

When you see “i”, say /i/ (as in pig)

When you see “tch”, say /ch/ (as in cheese)

/h/ – /i/ – /tch/

Now blend the sounds /h/ – /i/ – /tch/ and read hitch.

The word “am” is made up of two sounds (phonemes) – /a/ and /m/ (in spoken form).

The word “hitch” is made up of three sounds (phonemes) – “h”, “i”, and “tch” (in spoken form).

The word “am” is spelled with two graphemes – “a”, and “m” (in written form).

The word “hitch” is spelled with three graphemes – “h”, “i”, and “tch”.

That’s how to “crack” the alphabetic “code”. The process is referred to as “sounding out” words (decoding). It’s not necessary for the reader to know or understand the words phoneme, grapheme, or decoding. They just need to know the concept, and the process of interpreting them. Then they need to practice. Phonics is a rule-based system. Rules teach how the various graphemes are read, with only a few exceptions from the rules.  English readers only need to learn 44 graphemes made from 26 letters (which either stand alone or in combination with other letters).

Oh Mommy, My Wish is Coming True!

The irony of this whole fiasco surrounding illiteracy is this:

When using systematic phonics, reading is easy to teach!

It only requires one essential ingredient:

The love of literacy!

Evidence for this can be seen in testimonials from people who have used phonics to teach their children to read.  The publisher of one familiar phonics program: (Sam Blumenfeld’s Alpha-Phonics: A Primer for Beginning Readers) printed an amazing testimonial on the back cover of his book. This publisher, Peter Watt of Paradigm Books, tells that he has received endless letters, phone calls, and emails from parents and teachers over a span of nearly 40 years. Here is one he chose to print.

“My daughter is almost six years old, and we are home educating her… I have tried a couple of reading programs most of which were game type learning. None of these produced any results. I recently ordered Alpha-Phonics because I have heard Samuel Blumenfeld speak on several shows.

Dianna and I are just beginning lesson 7. After going over lessons three and four Dianna was so excited that she could read, that she hugged my neck and told me she loved me. She said, “Oh mommy, my wish is coming true. You and Daddy are teaching me to read.”

Yes, Dianna was reading. Lesson 6 in the book has short sentences like, “Dan has ham.” By lesson 7 Dianna would have learned to sound out the following graphemes: a, m, n, s, t, x, h, x, d, and w. She would have read words like: had, dad, sad, mad, ham, tan, tax, hat, and more. The letter concludes:

“By the way, we only spend about five to ten minutes a day on this.”

Coming next: Chapter Three — A Convicted Murderer, a Columbia Grad, and a Missionary

from Dyslexic no More: Saved by the ABC’s

by Meg Rayborn Dawson (homeschooling mom of 9)

MS, Exceptional Student Education (Univ. of W. Florida) emphasis on Applied Behavior Analysis

MA, psychology (Grand Canyon University)

Bachelor of Arts (Northwest Nazarene University)

 

***************************************************************

WEBSITE     TESTIMONIALS    

CATHY DUFFY REVIEW

OTHER REVIEWS     AWARDS     

HOW TO ORDER

For Parents who are concerned about assuring a solid base for their Children’s education. READING is the bedrock.  One good way to assure the best results is to teach your OWN children to read.  And it is much easier than you ever dreamed.  All you need is a good program like ALPHA-PHONICS.  Alpha-Phonics has been  used by tens of thousands of Parents, easily and successfully FOR 38 YEARS.  Most Parents find they only need 15-30 minutes a day and can complete the course in only a few Months.  Parents need NO experience or special training to teach their Children to become excellent readers. This may sound impossible, but, if you read the reviews and testimonials below, you will learn it is true.

 

 

 

Posted in education, homeschooling, Phonics, Reading, teaching, tutoring | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Biggest Education Innovation Is Growing Use of School Choice

NATIONAL SCHOOL CHOICE WEEK

The Biggest Education Innovation Is Growing Use of School Choice

Homeschooling, charter schools, and other “alternative” learning approaches are now mainstream.

| 

It wasn’t long ago that “normal” schooling meant public school, understood as some variation on the theme of classes punctuated by the sound of a bell, lunch in a cafeteria, and detours to run around with beat-up gym equipment. Catholic kids had similar experiences at parochial schools and some mostly rich kids went to private academies. Anything else was a little weird and required explanation. But, accelerated by pandemic-era stresses, innovations in recent years brought big changes to education. The biggest change of all is probably the growing acceptance won by charters, homeschooling, and a host of flexible approaches to teaching kids as the old model loses its luster.

Just how much the world has changed came home to me when the tech at my eye doctor’s office asked about my son, who attended a charter school with her daughter when the kids were younger. I mentioned that he was thriving as a homeschooler and had just started a laboratory biology class at the community college. Her daughter was also homeschooled, she told me. The girl was technically enrolled in the public high school now, but that was mostly to gain access to community college courses. Her daughter already had two years of college credits put away.

This conversation would have been almost unthinkable when I was in school. But the world has morphed dramatically since then, especially when it comes to our attitude towards education.

“How have your opinions on homeschooling changed as a result of the coronavirus?” EdChoice asks parents every month. In December 2021, 68 percent of respondents reported that they are more favorable to homeschooling than they were before the pandemic. Only 18 percent are less favorable.

It’s not just homeschooling. The same survey finds rising support (70 percent) for education savings accounts which allow parents to withdraw their children from public schools and receive a deposit of public funds to pay for education expenses, school vouchers (65 percent) by which public education funds follow students to the schools of their choice, and publicly funded but privately run charter schools (68 percent) like the one my son attended through third grade.

“Support for school choice in America continues to soar,” agreed survey findings published last summer by the American Federation for Children.

These alternatives were developed and building support long before COVID-19 emerged as a viral menace in early 2020. But the pandemic accelerated growing discontent with schools that were already widely seen as rigid, politicized, and ineffective. School officials who found educating kids a challenge in good times left kids high and dry in the midst of a public health crisis.

“That school systems have struggled to adapt to these unfamiliar conditions is understandable,” Alex Spurrier of Bellwether Education Partners noted last September. “But for millions of families, their willingness to tolerate institutional sclerosis in their children’s education is starting to wear thin.”

“I…and everybody in our community can no longer count on the public schools,” Jennifer Reesman, a Maryland mom, told NPR in November. “And I feel like after the last year and a half, there was a lot of that sentiment that this is just not something we can count on.”

Top ArticlesREAD MOREThe Evolving Challenges to Maintaining Anonymity

So, families that had never before considered alternatives sent their kids to charters or shelled out tuition for private schools. Others tried their hands at homeschooling or joined with other families to set up learning pods and microschools. And, as the polling numbers make clear, they became increasingly open to these alternatives and to policies that make it easier to escape closed classrooms, mask requirements, incompetent implementation of distance learning, and escalating curriculum battles. 

If you and your friends are dissatisfied with “normal” education and are giving the competition a try, it’s impossible to continue to think of homeschooling, charters, and other innovations as weird. And, as families go, so goes the culture in which they participate and the institutions with which they interact.

“Each applicant to Harvard College is considered with great care and homeschooled applicants are treated the same as all other applicants,” the Ivy League school specifies in its application requirements.

“William & Mary is happy to accept and review applications from students who have been home-schooled,” the prestigious Virginia state school notes on a page devoted to such applicants.

In taking college admission tests traditionally required (though becoming less prevalent) for college applications “homeschooled students can register for the SAT online or on paper, just like any other student,” says the College Board.

Private schools long ago gained acceptance among colleges and employers alike; the big change for them has been the number of families looking at policies that would make such alternatives more accessible. And even before the pandemic, charter schools won wide respect by successfully sending their graduates through college at a higher rate than traditional public schools.

“And while charter leaders don’t want to stir up more controversy by saying it out loud, the implication is clear: Traditional high schools need to get on board with the same goal,” Richard Whitmire wrote for education publication The 74 in 2017.

Employers are harder to pin down in terms of attitudes towards students and graduates from other than traditional public schools since there are so many of them with diverse viewpoints. But the local supermarket certainly didn’t balk at my son’s background and his bosses appreciate the resulting flexibility. The only challenge has been reining-in their enthusiasm for his availability when so many adults aren’t looking for work and traditionally schooled teens are in class. His experience is likely to be replicated around the country after what many people term a “historic” year for school choice, with more innovations to come.

“Wealthier parents always have an alternative. But many middle- and lower-income families don’t,” Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds (R) observed in her state of the state address earlier this month. “Which is why I’ll be introducing legislation that allows middle- and low-income families and students with an individualized educational plan to receive a portion of the ‘per pupil’ funds allocated annually by the state to move their child to the education system of their choice.”

As is often the case with big changes, success will be best measured by the degree to which education options that were once unthinkable become casually accepted parts of our everyday conversations.

************************************************************************************

*************************************************************************

Did you know every year many 1,000’s of parents teach their own children to READ? Many of them have used  Alpha-Phonics because they have found it can easily be used to teach their children to read. Your Kids can make a lot of headway in only a couple of weeks with this proven program.  Alpha-Phonics is easy to teach, is always effective and requires no special training for the Parent.   It works !  And it is  very inexpensive.  You CAN DO it !!  Follow the links below to know all about the time-tested (38 + years) Alpha-Phonics program:

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Education technology post-COVID-19: A missed opportunity?

Close up of school kids with tablet computers in classroom.

EDUCATION PLUS DEVELOPMENT

Education technology post-COVID-19: A missed opportunity?

 

While technology has transformed most industries—from air travel, to finance, to health care—it has yet to do the same in education. Before COVID-19, most school systems across the world did not look strikingly different from how they did in the 20th or even 19th centuries.

And investments in ed tech had mostly focused on deploying devices and connectivity, without much regard to their use by teachers and students for learning. Thus, it is not surprising that impact evaluations of investmentsfor example, the “one laptop per child at home” study in Perufound no impact on student learning. 

In a recent report co-authored with Alejandro Ganimian (NYU) and Rick Hess (American Enterprise Institute), “Realizing the promise: How can education technology improve learning for all?, we built on a simple yet intuitive theoretical framework created over two decades ago by two of the most prominent education researchers in the United States, David Cohen and Deborah Ball. They argued that the main reason so many school reforms had failed in the U.S. is the failure to pay adequate attention to what matters most to improve learning: the interactions between educators and learners around educational materials—what they termed the “instructional core.”  

My co-authors and I argue that the failed school-improvement efforts in the U.S. that motivated Cohen and Ball’s framework resemble the ed-tech reforms in much of the developing world in the lack of clarity around improving the interactions among educators, learners, and the educational material. We built on their framework by adding parents as key agents that mediate the relationships among learners, educators, and the material. 

After an extensive review of the evidence showing how ed-tech interventions are effective in improving student learning in low- and middle-income countries, we concluded that ed tech is most effective when it complements, not substitutes, the work of teachers. Specifically, we found that ed-tech interventions are most effective when they play to one or more of its comparative advantages: (1) scaling up quality instruction; (2) facilitating personalized instruction; (3) expanding opportunities for practice; and (4) increasing learner engagement (making it more fun to learn!). 

What is perhaps most troubling is that as countries are reopening schools, they are going back to how education was delivered before the pandemic, instead of seizing the opportunity of the disruption to transform education.

This framework is even more useful now to understand the impact of the COVID-19-related school closures on student learning, and how (or to what extent) ed tech has been able to mitigate learning losses. 

ED TECH AND MITIGATING LEARNING LOSS 

Almost a year ago, I worked with another group of co-authors (George Psacharopoulos, Harry Patrinos, and Victoria Collis) to build on previous research by Harry and George on the economic returns to education around the world to estimate the impact on learning losses and productivity using various scenarios of length of school closures. Our goal was to send a message to policymakers about the urgent need to reopen schools. Our research, which was published in the April 2021 issue of the Comparative Education Reviewestimated that the learning losses due to school closures were likely to lead to a reduction in global economic growth equivalent to an annual rate of 0.8 percent. This represents a total loss in constant U.S. dollars of a staggering $15 trillion. And, in absolute dollars, the losses are greatest in high-income countries, where learning levels and productivity tend to be higher. But over a cohort of students’ lifetimes, the losses as a share of GDP are much greater for students in low-income countries (62 percent) as compared to students in middle- (22 percent) and high-income (9 percent) countries. Using different assumptions and models, researchers at the World Bank and OECD have produced similar estimates.

But, a year later, we are seeing a series of empirical analyses of actual learning losses (as opposed to estimates), using data from students who missed out on school in various countries with varying levels of access to digital infrastructure, connectivity, and devices—and what we are seeing from this emerging evidence is sobering.

For instance, the Netherlands is a country that was relatively well equipped for online education, as 96 percent of Dutch households have access to the internet at home. While like most countries, the Netherlands closed schools in mid-March of 2020, it reopened them on May 11 of that year, and until June 7, children went to school part time to make groups smaller and easier to maintain social distance. Beginning on June 8, schools reopened at the regular schedule. By contrast, many countries in the developing world—including in South Asia, Africa, and Latin America, and the Caribbean—closed schools in mid-March and did not begin to reopen them until at least a year later.  

Despite the Netherland’s favorable conditions, a recent evaluation of learning growth among Dutch students found lower learning gains during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the growth of students in previous cohorts. Dutch students in grades one through five during 2020-2021 experienced average learning losses ranging from 0.06 to 0.20 standard deviations in reading and 0.13 to 0.33 standard deviations in math.  

While these are average learning losses, the research finds evidence of growing inequality, as students with less-educated parents and students from lower-income households experienced greater learning losses than their counterparts with more educated parents and from higher-income households. These larger learning losses compound previous already lower learning levels among the poor and children with parents with lower education levels. (Interestingly, there were no differences among students from migrant families or by gender).   

Recall that the Netherlands was well equipped for online learning and had relatively short periods of school closures. In contrast, in South Asia, Africa, and Latin America, many countries kept schools closed for more than one year, and some continue to keep schools closed two years after the onset of COVID-19 (Peru is an example). And few countries had the access to devices and connectivity of the Netherlands. For example, in April 2020, I wrote a Brookings report documenting that less than 25 percent of low-income countries were providing any type of remote learning, and of these, the majority were using TV and radio. In contrast, close to 90 percent of high-income countries were providing remote learning opportunities, nearly all of which were online. One notable exception is Uruguay, which over 15 years ago introduced a national one-to-one laptop/tablet program with connectivity for primary and secondary students. And, also exceptionally for the Latin American region, Uruguay began reopening schools in June of 2020. 

A MISSED OPPORTUNITY

However, what is perhaps most troubling is that as countries are reopening schools, they are going back to how education was delivered before the pandemic, instead of seizing the opportunity of the disruption to transform education. For example, in Uruguay, as the government prepares to reopen schools again for the 2022-23 academic year, no reforms to the traditional curriculum or instructional methods—for example, by integrating technology in classrooms as opposed to using it primarily outside of them—have been announced.   

And there is still much to learn from exactly how different uses of ed tech at scale affected student learning during the school closures. While there are some rigorous evaluations of small-scale interventions (for example, the use of mobile phones and texting to reach primary-school students’ parents to mitigate learning losses in basic numeracy in Botswana), there are few evaluations of programs that were delivered at scalefor example, TV, radio, and online instructional platforms.  

While the disruptions caused by COVID-19 offered an historic opportunity to learn about what works at scale to transform education systems and realize the promise of education technology, it seems now that this is unlikely to happen, at least in a majority of low- and middle-income countries. This is truly a missed opportunity that will have lasting impacts on generations to come.  

Posted in Education technology post-COVID-19: A missed opportunity?, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Open Forum: A homeschooling mother is troubled by SOL (Standards of Learning) results

 Jan 27, 2022
 As a stay-at-home/homeschooling mom of a preschooler, I’ve recently read the news articles and exchanges between people in the community over masking kids in our local schools.

Set aside the current controversy that currently divides half of the community for a moment and direct your attention to data from the Virginia Department of Education. These numbers are specific to Frederick County:

The 2018-19 pass rate for Standards of Learning (SOL) for all students in Frederick County:

  • English and reading: 74%
  • Science: 79%
  • Mathematics: 79%

There are no SOL test results for 2019-20 available due to the closure of schools and cancellation of state assessments.

The 2020-21 pass rate for SOLs for all students in Frederick County:

  • English and reading: 64%
  • Science: 52%
  • Mathematics: 49%

The 2018-19 SOL assessments also included writing as well as history and social sciences, but 2020-21 did not. I would be interested to know why.

Children have been pushed aside and left behind for two years and are left to pick up the pieces of their education while the adults scream about personal opinions of risk assessment. At the end of the 2021-22 school year, those pass rates will either go up, remain the same, or decline. No matter which side of the masking debate you find yourself on, the reality that large percentages of children aren’t passing basic education assessments such as reading, math and science should concern you on some level.

There is a long list of reasons why I advocate for homeschooling, but I know that is not an option for every family. In the end, my heart breaks for the children caught in the middle who have no say in any of it … and they are the ones who end up suffering the most.

Regardless of students being masked or unmasked, if rates continue to decline and they fail to pass their SOLs, then the adults have failed children in more ways than one.

Sarah Skeith is a resident of Middletown.

******************************************************************************

Be a HERO:  Teach a Child to READ

Did you know every year many 1,000’s of parents teach their own children to READ? Many of them have used  Alpha-Phonics because they have found it can easily be used to teach their children to read. Your Kids can make a lot of headway in only a couple of weeks with this proven program.  Alpha-Phonics is easy to teach, is always effective and requires no special training for the Parent.   It works !  And it is  very inexpensive.  You CAN DO it !!  Follow the links below to know all about the time-tested (38 + years) Alpha-Phonics program:

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What We Know About Paternity Leave

MARCH 14, 2022

What We Know About Paternity Leave

Highlights

  • Paternity leave seems to be confirming the existence of the innate differences between mothers and fathers that feminist-minded experts assume to be mere social construction.
  • In most respects, the choices of mothers and fathers continue to mirror familiar gender patterns despite government incentives to adopt androgynous ways.

Over the past decades, paternity leave has moved way up in the list of favored family policies. For anyone interested in the well-being of contemporary families, that’s good news. On the most concrete level, fathers are a crucial form of support in a world where couples often live far from the female relatives who traditionally would have taken the night shift. It gives solace when mothers are still recuperating from childbirth, and, if I remember correctly, in a state of mild panic at the thought of being left alone with the little alien. It gives new moms a chance to go to a doctor’s appointment, to take a can’t-wait business call, and to satisfy a longing for a long, hot shower. It sets the stage for close father-child bonds, a bond with unique benefits for young children. In a deeper sense, paternity leave allows couples to share the shock of being catapulted into a new stage of life and to absorb the reality of their new, intertwined identity.

Reading through the extensive research on the subject, however, you’d have to conclude that experts think about paternity leave very differently. Their primary interest has not been family bonding, nor even involved fathers as a good in and of themselves, but the re-ordering of gender relations. Fathers need to take care of their infant sons and daughters so that women will be freer to pursue their careers, or as economists sometimes put it, to reach their “full labor market potential.” Paternity leave will ensure that fathers develop their childcare skills so they will stop viewing mothers as the default caretaker. That would allow women to shift some of their energies from domestic responsibilities to market work, to earn more money, and so bring about more gender equality. Women who cut back work hours, work part time, or maybe even stay at home to be with their children represent a retreat into the socially-constructed gender roles policy needs to overcome. Equality is all.

On these grounds, the results of paternity leave have been at best ho-hum. It’s still early in the game—paternity leave has only been around since the late 20th century—but thus far, there’s not much evidence to support the assumptions of policy egalitarians. On the contrary, paternity leave seems to be confirming the existence of the innate differences between mothers and fathers that feminist-minded experts assume to be mere social construction.

It’s easy from our 21st century vantage point to underestimate just how radical an idea paternity leave was when it was first hatched. At least as a regular practice, father care of infants has been virtually unknown in human history (for anyone interested, here’s the one small exception.) So, when in 1974, Sweden re-imagined its long-established six-month maternity leave as “parental leave,” thereby allowing fathers to use some part of the time off if couples so wished, it was a hinge moment in the history of family policy. Other Nordics were quick to pick up on the idea and introduced their own similar policies.

There was only one problem: couples didn’t bite. For almost two decades, even as women took the leave offered to them, men did what they always did and went to the office or factory. Whether this was because their bosses and peers looked askance at the idea of paternity leave or because they simply preferred to be at work rather than caring for a newborn at home is hard to know. But in 1993, Norway came up with what has become the preferred nudge for foot-dragging dads: reserve at least four weeks of parental leave for fathers alone. Only dads could use that month; there was no room for “Honey, there’s a big project the boss wants me to lead. Do you mind if you stay home instead?” The ploy worked. In 1992, only 2.4% of Norwegian fathers took leave; their numbers soared to 70% in 1997. Sweden and Iceland saw a similar jump after they introduced what has come to be known as the “daddy month” or “daddy quota.” And in 2002 Sweden introduced a second month just for dads, while Norway went to 15 weeks.

The Norwegian approach has caught on throughout the post-industrialized world. In 2006, Quebec adopted a “daddy quota” similar to the Scandinavian model, including five weeks of dedicated, non-transferable, government-paid leave for new fathers. Italy, a one-time capital of machismo, began to require fathers to take 7 days off within the first five months of their child’s birth. A regulation from the European Union, the “EU Work–Life Balance Directive of 2019,” now requires member states to allow at least 2 full nontransferable daddy months in the year or two after a child’s birth, in addition to 10 days at the time of birth.

With the help of feminist-inclined researchers and policy bureaucrats, countries have begun to comply. Spain recently upped its paternity leave to 16 weeks, the same as the country’s maternity leave; the policy puts them ahead of Sweden in gender-equality terms. Last year, France increased its leave for fathers to 28 days, more than doubling the time offered just a few years ago. As most readers probably know, the glaring exception is the United States. The federal government has remained determinedly neutral on the entire subject of leave, though 9 states and the District of Columbia are developing their own paternity leave policies. Perhaps the most unlikely example comes from Japan and South Korea. These two countries, notoriously traditional in their domestic arrangements and sporting sky high gender gaps, now offer some of the most generous paternity leave benefits in the world.

So, what do we know about the impact of paternity leave on gender equality so far? Firm conclusions are hard to come by since paternity leave looks different depending on the country. Some offer only a skimpy two weeks, others 6 months, some let couples decide how to divide up the available leave time, others set aside “daddy months” that can’t be transferred to mothers. Some give fathers 100% pay, some 70%, others nothing. But what seems clear is that by and large, if you offer fathers leave, they will take it under two conditions: first, leave-takers have to be compensated at least 70% of their regular salary, and second, dads must have their own earmarked nontransferable leave time. When either of those two qualifications are absent, parental leave will largely remain women’s territory.

Take the example of California, which passed a law allowing 6 weeks in 2004 at about 55% of usual pay; women increased their leave time by two to three weeks. As for men, they added a mere two or three days. By contrast, 75% of new fathers in Quebec stayed home after the province launched a use-it-or-lose it, well-compensated 5 weeks; before the reform only 22% took job-protected leave.

Whatever the reason for growing father involvement, it has not changed the fact that mothers continue to spend more time taking care of the kids than fathers; they continue to put in significantly fewer hours in the labor market, and they continue to earn less money.

This doesn’t mean that the earmarked-leave and generous-compensation formula is a reliable path to 50/50 work-family life sharing. On the contrary, in most respects, the choices of mothers and fathers continue to mirror familiar gender patterns despite government incentives to adopt androgynous ways. Maybe it’s not surprising that a trad country like South Korea has only been able to increase father’s uptake from 5% in 2014 to a modest 20% in 2019. Or that “paternity harassment by annoyed employers is common enough in Japan that only an anemic 7% of new fathers take paternity leave. Or even that only about half of German fathers take leave despite being offered Scandinavian level benefits. More striking are the progressive countries where fathers do take months of leave but almost never more than the minimum determined by their country’s regulations. That’s quite different than mothers who tend to go for whatever they can get. Quebec dads, for example, may get good marks for taking their 5 weeks of daddy leave, but their efforts still pale next to the 46 weeks taken by mothersIn Denmark and Finland, mothers take 90% of total leave offered to parents. Iceland and Sweden fathers do better, though even there, mothers take 70% of the total parental leave available to couples.

None of this is to deny that fathers are taking care of their young children far more than they did a generation ago. Or that men don’t now see fatherhood as more central to their identities. Whether this is due to paternity leave policies or broader cultural changes or the biological benefits of father involvement is an open question. Note that this shift is true even for the United States, where access to paid paternity leave has been rare. Whatever the reason for growing father involvement, it has not changed the fact that mothers continue to spend more time taking care of the kids than fathers; they continue to put in significantly fewer hours in the labor market, and they continue to earn less money. You can find a few studies that show paternity leave to be associated with an increase in mother’s labor force participation, but the increase in actual time spent at work is almost always modest. Other studies find either no effect or even a negative effect on mother’s workforce attachment.

One of the most recent papers examining the impact of paternity leave on mother’s work hours in 10 European countries continues in this vein. In three of the countries studied, mothers’ employment and hours increased; in another three, there was an increase in mothers’ employment rates, but a decrease in average weekly hours worked (it seems more mothers were going to work – but only part time); and in the remaining two countries there was no effect at all. Another 2021 paper from Austria bluntly concluded that the “enormous expansions of parental leave and child care subsidies have had virtually no impact on gender convergence.” In the Nordic states, where paternity leave has been around the longest and where gender parity is close to a national religion, it’s a similar story. A quarter of all working women in Sweden still put in only part time hours; in Iceland, Denmark and Norway, the amount is closer to a third.

Needless to say, part-time work by men is rare. Scholars and policy architects predicted gender revolution policies like paternity leave would bring not just more equal caretaking and less burdened women, but higher fertility. It may be the opposite. New studies from South Korea and Spain suggest that men who take leave lose interest in having more children.

It’s strange to think that my WWII-generation father, beloved dad to three children, never changed a diaper in his life. His incompetence was not at all unusual in his day. But now that we have made the happy discovery that fathers are fully capable of feeding, comforting, and changing their infants,  taking them to the supermarket in a front-pack baby carrier, and singing them to sleep, there will be no going back. Nor should there be. Still, it’s a leap too far from this newly-recognized truth of men’s ability to care for the youngest children to the idea that mothers and fathers can be molded into generic, interchangeable parents. There will be outliers as there always are in human affairs, but most couples find that mothers have a more visceral, physiological connection to their children, especially when they are babies. Policymakers need to keep these realities in mind when trying to order our multi-faceted lives.

Kay S. Hymowitz is the William E. Simon Fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a contributing editor of City Journal. She writes extensively on childhood, family issues, poverty.

************************************************************************************

                           Be a HERO:  Teach a Child to READ

Did you know every year many 1,000’s of parents teach their own children to READ? Many of them have used  Alpha-Phonics because they have found it can easily be used to teach their children to read. Your Kids can make a lot of headway in only a couple of weeks with this proven program.  Alpha-Phonics is easy to teach, is always effective and requires no special training for the Parent.   It works !  And it is  very inexpensive.  You CAN DO it !!  Follow the links below to know all about the time-tested (38 + years) Alpha-Phonics program:

 

 

 

Posted in What We Know About Paternity Leave  | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

FROM GHANA:  Teaching Children The Art Of Reading

 

FROM  GHANA:  Teaching Children The Art Of Reading

 2d ago    |    Source: BusinessGhana

Pic

Posted in FROM  GHANA:  Teaching Children The Art Of Reading | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

FROM INDIA: Lessons I Learned When Homeschooling My 3 Children Over 13 Years

 

FROM INDIA:  Lessons I Learned When Homeschooling My 3 Children Over 13 Years

Maharashtra-based June Mendez shares her learnings of homeschooling her three kids. Currently pursuing successful careers, her grown-up children thank their mother for being prudent in this decision.

June Mendez used to be a teacher until 2010. A mother to three children, June and her husband decided on homeschooling their kids – a decision that changed their lives.

“Yes, I was a teacher but physics, chemistry, biology and mathematics was not my forte. I was an English teacher,” begins June, who is often told that ‘homeschooling came easy’ to her since she was a teacher.

June took this decision when her eldest daughter, C’estlavie was in Class 6, her son Zeus was in Class 5 and the youngest, a daughter, Tenzin was in Class 2. “My reasons for homeschooling them was not because they were not doing well in school or having any trouble coping. I was looking at giving them access to wholesome education and experiences,” says June to The Better India.

Even though June was a teacher herself, the idea of homeschooling was not one she came up with.

Homeschooling
Learning important life skills.

She says, “I had studied in a boarding school and the experiences I gathered there remain special to me. So, I wasn’t convinced of homeschooling the children and not allowing them to experience those moments.” It was June’s husband who mooted the idea when their eldest daughter was just starting pre-school. She adds, “I was dead against the idea at the time as I didn’t think I was well equipped to take on such a huge responsibility.”

June started noticing how her older daughter and son were soon caught up in the desire to excel, without learning along the way. “I was watching my three children metamorphose into clones. I felt that they were slowly losing their individuality and that was something I did not want for them,” says June. The joy in learning started to dwindle and the children were merely performing tasks to tick the boxes. “They spent so much time in school and at home doing school work, that they didn’t have enough time for themselves to enjoy things they were passionate about and discover new passions without a deadline or a schedule.”

‘I didn’t want my children to fall into the same rut.’

Homeschooling
Enjoying some time with his father.

“Along with the children being pulled into the rat race, I found myself also falling into that trap as a parent. I felt myself becoming a typical pushy parent wanting my children to be first in class, finish their work in time, etc.” Wanting to break free from this rut, June says that the opportunity to home school presented itself as an ideal solution

June also speaks about how she often found her youngest, then in Class 2, staying up until late trying to finish her homework and then having to wake up as early as 5 am to complete it. “I didn’t think a student of Class 2 should take on so much stress,” she adds. June was clear that this cycle needed to stop.

With each child being in a different Class June says that it wasn’t easy but it was most certainly an interesting experience. “We have all grown up together in this process. My biggest learning was to slow down, listen to the children and tune into what would work for them individually,” she says. While June’s husband helped the children explore their creativity and taught them the inherent values of setting goals, from June they learnt to understand their strengths and weaknesses and adapt their learning styles to what suited them.

This process of homeschooling came with its challenges and highlighting some, June says, “At the start, I was so consumed with wanting to do things right that I almost ended up doing everything wrong by devising my own system. I had timetables and schedules for everything — a well-planned syllabus that I had to complete and it was only when my husband pointed out that I was running a parallel school at home that I realised I was giving them the same experience they were getting at their school.”

After the initial few hiccups, June says that she saw how well each child adapted to the new way of learning. From playing various musical instruments to exploring their artistic side by painting and spending time reading, June believes that her children flourished.

Learning With The Children

Homeschooling
Tenzin after a tennis tournament.

While C’estlavie and Zeus are just one year apart and had a lot in common, June says that for Tenzin initially, it was a slight problem. “She did miss having some friends around and that was when I introduced her to books and pen-pals. Both of which she took to very well. She made friends with people from all across the world and that helped her see things in a very different light,” says June.

Just like all other school-going children, June also had her own set of rules for the children. This included a fixed bedtime and a fair amount of discipline that was part of their growing up years. “There was a structure to what we would do. We did not have an hourly break-up of the day but broadly knew what would be covered on any given day. We learnt a lot by watching documentaries and even with hands-on experiments. ‘Learning from doing’ was our motto,” says June.

In moments of frustration, June says that she would escape into her room and stay there until she felt calm. “I would make it abundantly clear to my children to stay away from me for a while. That would usually help me feel better. It is important to acknowledge all these feelings that one might face during this process,” she says.

Today, at 23 years of age, C’estlavie is working with the art department on a movie set. Having spent six years being homeschooled she says, “It was the best thing that happened to me. A lot of who I am and the choices I have made in life have stemmed from the experience of being homeschooled.” C’estlavie says that while she did feel a sense of nervousness when she went into the exam hall to give her board examination, she never let that overpower her. “We were given the freedom to explore and learn whatever and however we thought it right. That trust that mom placed in me did wonders,” she adds.

Zeus on the other hand graduated as a gold medallist from Jindal Global University where he studied International Relations. As a proud mother, June adds, “In his second year at University he co-authored a book titled ‘Crafting a National Security Strategy for India’ with his professor.”

Tenzin is currently evaluating several interests that lie ahead of her.

“Children will bloom if given the space to,” asserts June.

June’s Tips For Parents Considering Homeschooling:

Kids painting the wall
Painting the station

1. Believe in the step you’ve taken – It won’t be all smooth sailing but it does work out in the end.
2. Allow your children to explore as many avenues as possible – They will eventually figure out the path ahead. If not, you as parents will realise their strengths that will allow you to give them a better direction.
3. Don’t stress about exams or curriculum – Allow learning to be fun. Teach your children to be independent learners and success will follow.
4. Don’t be afraid to set boundaries – Children do need a firm hand sometimes. However, don’t overdo it. If you are going to set boundaries, stay firm and lead by example. It’s also okay to reward them occasionally but teach your kids to earn these rewards.
5. Most importantly, let go of preconceived notions – Every child is unique so what works for one family may not work the same with another. Your journey is your own.

(Edited by Yoshita Rao)

To start your journey towards building a sustainable life, explore and enroll yourself in courses by The Better Academy.

For latest positive and happy stories on unsung heroes, impact, innovation, inspiration, and more, visit The Better India.

We at The Better India want to showcase everything that is working in this country. By using the power of constructive journalism, we want to change India – one story at a time. If you read us, like us and want this positive movement to grow, then do consider supporting us via the following buttons:

Like this story? Or have something to share?

Write to us: contact [at] thebetterindia [dot] com

Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter

***********************************************************************************

Did you know every year many 1,000’s of parents teach their own children to READ? Many of them have used  Alpha-Phonics because they have found it can easily be used to teach their children to read. Your Kids can make a lot of headway in only a couple of weeks with this proven program.  Alpha-Phonics is easy to teach, is always effective and requires no special training for the Parent.   It works !  And it is  very inexpensive.  You CAN DO it !!  Follow the links below to know all about the time-tested (38 + years) Alpha-Phonics program:

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment